Debate: Ehrman vs Craig

Bart Ehrman hands William Lane Craig his ass in this debate on the resurrection. Craig refuses to admit that there are errors in the bible and then refuses to answer any questions in relation to the fact. Things to watch out for: He tries to poison the well by stating Ehrman's position incorrectly. He appeals heavily to other authorities and fails to realize that Ehrman is a very important authority on the subject matter. He tries to compare Hume's argument against miracles to Ehrman and then proceeds to attack Hume while failing to address Ehrman's argument. He fails to admit that he has no basis for critically evaluating the manuscripts since he has a an a-priori bias that they are true. He fails to answer whether or not the later accounts are less reliable since he accepts that the earliest accounts are generally more reliable. *Update* Craigs bogus stats unraveled here